Preserved supervised synthesis

Plecanatide synthesis · version 1

This URL preserves the exact reviewed public wording and source set for synthesis version 1.

Supervised synthesis

What do selected human studies report about Plecanatide?

Manually reviewed September 15, 2026 · version 1

Browse all Human Evidence Reviews · Open preserved synthesis version 1 →

Three selected publications report four randomized phase 3 trials in adults with chronic idiopathic constipation or irritable bowel syndrome with constipation.123

Bottom line from this bounded source set

The trials found more participants met prespecified bowel-response endpoints with plecanatide than placebo. Diarrhea occurred more often with active treatment; these 12-week studies do not establish comparative superiority to other medicines.123

Reviewed study record

Chronic idiopathic constipation: first phase 3 trial

Design

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial over 12 weeks with two active groups.1

Population

1,394 adults with chronic idiopathic constipation were randomized.1

Outcomes reported

Durable bowel-response rates were 21.0% and 19.5% in active groups versus 10.2% with placebo. Diarrhea occurred in 5.9% and 5.7% versus 1.3%.1

Limitations

The endpoint combines frequency and persistence of response. Results concern the enrolled adults and short follow-up, not all constipation causes.1

Reviewed study record

Chronic idiopathic constipation: second phase 3 trial

Design

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 12-week trial.2

Population

1,337 adults were allocated across two active groups and placebo.2

Outcomes reported

Durable responder rates were 20.1% and 20.0% versus 12.8%. Diarrhea occurred in 3.2% and 4.5% versus 1.3%.2

Limitations

This is a separate trial from the first constipation report. Patient diaries and the defined responder threshold need full-report appraisal.2

Reviewed study record

Irritable bowel syndrome with constipation: two trials

Design

Two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trials over 12 weeks.3

Population

2,189 adults were randomized across both trials; 1,879 completed.3

Outcomes reported

Combined pain-and-bowel response was more frequent in active groups in each trial. Diarrhea occurred in about 4% of active-group participants versus 1% with placebo and sometimes led to withdrawal.3

Limitations

The publication contains two studies and uses an endpoint different from the chronic-constipation trials. Cross-trial response percentages are not treatment rankings.3

Reviewed source set

  1. PubMed · 28169285A Randomized Phase III Clinical Trial of Plecanatide, a Uroguanylin Analog, in Patients With Chronic Idiopathic Constipation. ↗PubMed PMID 28169285 · EFetch XML reviewed 2026-09-15 · payload SHA-256 fb1a08d480ff886b0af95cffce18d0803cd62d98d4609187165d4ca9cd7a7689
    No registered Crossref update in the reviewed snapshotChecked September 15, 2026 for DOI 10.1038/ajg.2016.611. This bounded result is not proof that the publication has never been corrected or retracted. Open the pinned Crossref work endpoint ↗
  2. PubMed · 29147135Randomized clinical trial: efficacy and safety of plecanatide in the treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation. ↗PubMed PMID 29147135 · EFetch XML reviewed 2026-09-15 · payload SHA-256 26cf34ec94efdddd9e1b4586101cbd99f74123b951080a793a0bf4ad6d606357
    No registered Crossref update in the reviewed snapshotChecked September 15, 2026 for DOI 10.1177/1756283x17734697. This bounded result is not proof that the publication has never been corrected or retracted. Open the pinned Crossref work endpoint ↗
  3. PubMed · 29545635Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of plecanatide in patients with irritable bowel syndrome with constipation: results of two phase 3 randomized clinical trials. ↗PubMed PMID 29545635 · EFetch XML reviewed 2026-09-15 · payload SHA-256 73aecbea220f39b9829164d1a1409e8d4ef8f9d62108dbd707104f575b21066c
    No registered Crossref update in the reviewed snapshotChecked September 15, 2026 for DOI 10.1038/s41395-018-0026-7. This bounded result is not proof that the publication has never been corrected or retracted. Open the pinned Crossref work endpoint ↗